swiss_design_lineage_vibecoding

Quality Review Template

Check Before Submitting

---

✅ Design Quality

Style Authenticity

• Matches my chosen style’s visual characteristics
• Uses style-appropriate typography
• Implements correct color palette from style guide
• Captures the style’s philosophy and vibe
• Doesn’t look generic or default modern design

Visual Polish

• Professional, polished appearance
• Consistent design throughout all pages
• Proper visual hierarchy (clear importance levels)
• Appropriate spacing and white space
• Clean, intentional details

Content Quality

• Meaningful content (not lorem ipsum)
• Authentic information about the style
• Well-chosen reference images
• Clear information architecture
• Engaging, readable presentation

Notes on design: ___________ _______________

---

✅ Technical Quality

Responsive Design

• Works on desktop (1920px)
• Works on tablet (768px)
• Works on mobile (375px)
• No horizontal scrolling on any size
• All text readable at all sizes
• Images scale properly
• Touch targets large enough on mobile

Lighthouse Scores

Run test at: https://pagespeed.web.dev/

• Performance: 90+ ⚡
• Accessibility: 90+ ♿
• Best Practices: 90+ ✨
• SEO: 90+ 🔍

My scores:

• Performance: __
• Accessibility: __
• Best Practices: __
• SEO: __

Code Quality

• No console errors (check browser dev tools)
• All links work (no 404s)
• All images have alt text
• Semantic HTML (header, nav, main, footer)
• Proper heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3)
• ARIA labels on interactive elements

Technical issues found: ___________ _______________

---

✅ Content Completeness

Required Pages

• Homepage (excellent quality)
• At least one content page (timeline/designers/about)
• Collaboration story page
• All pages have meaningful content

Navigation

• Navigation works on all pages
• Current page indicated
• Mobile navigation functional
• All links go to correct pages

---

✅ Documentation

Research Folder

• /research/references/ folder exists
• Contains 10-15 reference images
• references.md documents sources

Process Documentation

• Process screenshots saved
• Key decisions documented
• Time tracking completed
• Collaboration story reflects journey

README

• Style chosen clearly stated
• Total time spent documented
• Key decisions explained
• Live URL included
• Repository is public

---

✅ Final Checks

Before Deployment

• All pages complete
• All content proofread
• All images optimized
• Final Lighthouse run passed
• Git commits with clear messages
• All work committed to GitHub

After Deployment

• Live site accessible
• All pages load correctly
• All links work in production
• Mobile responsive in production
• No console errors in production

Submission

• Live URL submitted
• GitHub repository link submitted
• Repository is public
• README updated with live URL

---

🎯 Quality Targets

Must have (required):

• ✅ Matches chosen style authentically
• ✅ All Lighthouse scores 90+
• ✅ Responsive on all devices
• ✅ No broken functionality

Should have (strong project):

• ✅ 3+ complete pages
• ✅ Polished details throughout
• ✅ Rich process documentation
• ✅ Thoughtful design decisions

Nice to have (excellent project):

• ✅ 5+ complete pages
• ✅ Advanced interactions
• ✅ Exceptional typography
• ✅ Portfolio-worthy quality

---

🚨 Common Issues

If you find these, fix before submitting:

❌ Mobile layout broken ❌ Images too large (slow load) ❌ Low Lighthouse accessibility score ❌ Generic design (doesn’t match style) ❌ Lorem ipsum text ❌ Missing alt text on images ❌ Console errors ❌ Broken links ❌ Missing documentation

---

💡 Self-Assessment

Honestly rate your project:

Design authenticity: ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Technical quality: ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Documentation: ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐

What I’m most proud of: _____________

What I would improve with more time: _____________

---

Ready to submit? If 80%+ of checks pass, you’re good to go! ✨